Attendance: Rameiya, Dayna, Sandy, Josette, Carol, Kim, Lauren, Alan
Action Items:
1. Determine the need of implementation at site meetings - Rameiya
2. Create a list of prompts/questions for site meetings – Rameiya
3. Reach out to each site at the 15-min check in to obtain feedback on ECHO Cycle 3 planning and frequency in the summer – Rameiya
4. Discuss Implementation updates at the next implementation call – Dayna
Minutes:
● Project Team - Rameiya
o Slaight/Site meetings
▪ Reach out to Aristotle re: the need of implementation at site meetings
▪ Develop a list of questions/prompts to ask site clinicians
● ECHO Planning
o Cycle 3 (frequency of summer sessions, curriculum in the summer/throughout)
▪ Thunder Bay enjoyed the psychosis with developmental delay and cognitive challenges session; also, pushing for more time with the didactic presenter
▪ Waterloo recommended sessions addressing tricks around module 4
▪ Discuss a case scenario and how clinicians overcame challenges with a particular patient (obesity, etc. )
▪ Another topic session is family and supportive education and how to support the interventions
▪ At weekly site meetings, ask clinicians which module they are struggling with and how they have adapted certain modules based on practice reality
▪ North Bay suggests sessions on better fidelity for models as they do not have a SEE component at their site
o Frequency of summer sessions:
▪ Thunder bay and Waterloo - 2 sessions per month
▪ North Bay prefers 1 session per month
o Summer curriculum
▪ Discuss the journey of a challenging yet successful case
o Site leads have agreed to change the structure of a few ECHO sessions by having the case presentation before the didactic
● Implementation Updates - evolution of support needs
o Defer this discussion to next week
● Any other updates?
o Thunder bay team appreciates the tracking log as it helps them find ways to improve
o There will be minor changes to the tracking log based on feedback
▪ Fluidity of “initial treatment plan” will be addressed
▪ Add item about family member being invited to participate to determine if they denied to participate or not
Comments